<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandaideblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandaideblog.com</link>
	<description>BrandAide:  Trademark, Intellectual Property and Cyber Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intel on when to draw the line on infringement suits</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/intellectual-property/intel-on-when-to-draw-the-line-on-infringement-suits/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/intellectual-property/intel-on-when-to-draw-the-line-on-infringement-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark; registration; Intel; bully; infringement; dilution; Mexican Watch; ebay; McDonalds; lawsuits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel’s recent string of unreasonable trademark suits is a good lesson for large companies with the money to pay lawyers to bully smaller competitors (and even noncompetitors.) While it’s necessary and vital to protect your brand name from infringement and dilution, it’s also important to know when to draw the line to protect your reputation with the public.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/intellectual-property/intel-on-when-to-draw-the-line-on-infringement-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lesson from Corbis Copyright Registration Procedure:   Your photographs may not be protected unless you register your own copyrights</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/lesson-from-corbis-copyright-registration-procedure-your-photographs-may-not-be-protected-unless-you-register-your-own-copyrights/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/lesson-from-corbis-copyright-registration-procedure-your-photographs-may-not-be-protected-unless-you-register-your-own-copyrights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual artists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photographers who have utilized Corbis’s copyright registration program since the mid-90s may have less copyright protection than they think. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/lesson-from-corbis-copyright-registration-procedure-your-photographs-may-not-be-protected-unless-you-register-your-own-copyrights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright, branding questions answered. Artists, check it out.</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/copyright-branding-questions-answered-artists-check-it-out/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/copyright-branding-questions-answered-artists-check-it-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police your mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the common questions that artists and bands always ask is, “How can I copyright my music and secure that my band is the only one allowed to use that name?”
How can you ensure that no one else will use your name—your brand?
We hope this interview will give bands a better idea of how to protect their cherished name and brand. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/copyright-branding-questions-answered-artists-check-it-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademarks as Google Adwords:  ECJ rules for Google, but Trademark Owners Still Have Rights</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/advertising/trademarks-as-google-adwords-ecj-rules-for-google-but-trademark-owners-still-have-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/advertising/trademarks-as-google-adwords-ecj-rules-for-google-but-trademark-owners-still-have-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police your mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) underscores the reason for business owners to have a cost efficient monitoring program in place.  Competitors are purchasing trademarks as Google AdWords.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/advertising/trademarks-as-google-adwords-ecj-rules-for-google-but-trademark-owners-still-have-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>yogitoes&#8211;Setting the Standard for Organic Brands</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/yogitoes-setting-the-standard-for-organic-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/yogitoes-setting-the-standard-for-organic-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word organic has been popping up all over the place lately.  Do a search and you will find organic food, organic wine, organic beauty products, organic textiles… you get the picture.  Organic implies a more natural way of approaching what we consume.  Let’s face it… these days organic is big business… but can business be organic?

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/yogitoes-setting-the-standard-for-organic-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Devil Wears Prada: Criminals Involved in Fake Goods Are Often Involved in Human Trafficking</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/the-devil-wears-prada-criminals-involved-in-fake-goods-are-often-involved-in-human-trafficking/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/the-devil-wears-prada-criminals-involved-in-fake-goods-are-often-involved-in-human-trafficking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police your mark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 11, 2010, National Human Trafficking Awareness Month was launched across the U.S.   Human trafficking involves horrible mistreatment of children, with some abuses too difficult to even speak of, much less imagine.  Did you ever wonder who makes those “cheap” GUCCI knockoffs?  Those DKNY items on street corners?  Many of them may well have involved child labor, some of them akin to slavery.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/the-devil-wears-prada-criminals-involved-in-fake-goods-are-often-involved-in-human-trafficking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s your copyright worth if it’s not registered prior to someone stealing your work?</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/what%e2%80%99s-your-copyright-worth-if-it%e2%80%99s-not-registered-prior-to-someone-stealing-your-work/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/what%e2%80%99s-your-copyright-worth-if-it%e2%80%99s-not-registered-prior-to-someone-stealing-your-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art Licesning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visual and graphic artists are particularly vulnerable to unauthorized reproduction of copyrighted images on the Internet.  It’s literally a simple “right click,” “copy,” and “paste.”  Many such infringements go undetected.  Those that are discovered are often let go without remedial action. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/what%e2%80%99s-your-copyright-worth-if-it%e2%80%99s-not-registered-prior-to-someone-stealing-your-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ready for Art Licensing 102?  Advance On!</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/ready-for-art-licensing-102-advance-on/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/ready-for-art-licensing-102-advance-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art Licesning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wednesday January 20, 2010, 5:30-6:30pm PST.
FREE Art Licensing Teleseminar!
IP Attorney Cheryl Hodgson will answer the questions: Hosted by Artist Tara Reed]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/copyright/ready-for-art-licensing-102-advance-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oprah’s “aha moment”— Is this your trademark’s “aha moment?”</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/oprah%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9caha-moment%e2%80%9d%e2%80%94-is-this-your-trademark%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9caha-moment%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/oprah%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9caha-moment%e2%80%9d%e2%80%94-is-this-your-trademark%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9caha-moment%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss of rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police your mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Aha moment.”  What do you think of when you hear that phrase?  Or should I ask who do you think of?  Oprah Winfrey would like it to be her!  However, after her recent settlement with Mutual of Omaha insurance company, she might not be the only one that can use the popular phrase.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/brand/oprah%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9caha-moment%e2%80%9d%e2%80%94-is-this-your-trademark%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9caha-moment%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC REGULATIONS AFFECT INTERNET AFFILIATE RELATIONSHIPS, ENDORSEMENTS AND TESTIMONIALS</title>
		<link>http://brandaideblog.com/advertising/ftc-regulations-affect-internet-affiliate-relationships-endorsements-and-testimonials/</link>
		<comments>http://brandaideblog.com/advertising/ftc-regulations-affect-internet-affiliate-relationships-endorsements-and-testimonials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandaideblog.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Internet marketers affected by the new FTC regulations?  The answer is yes!  Recent changes taking effect December 1, 2009 have been made to the FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brandaideblog.com/advertising/ftc-regulations-affect-internet-affiliate-relationships-endorsements-and-testimonials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
